<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steelers Training Camp BattleZone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicepickcowher.com/2009/08/03/steelers-training-camp-battlezone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2009/08/03/steelers-training-camp-battlezone/</link>
	<description>A Pittsburgh Steelers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: "O"</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2009/08/03/steelers-training-camp-battlezone/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>"O"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=1063#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Yeah I just looked around the league and the best backup in the league is Charlie Batch. I don&#039;t know what it is about him I don&#039;t like maybe just his name. But like I said in my other post. He hasn&#039;t done anything wrong when he has played, and makes good decisions. But he is the best option besides Leftwitch,and we all know we couldn&#039;t keep him on the sidelines. Well I am the one with my *&amp;$! in the wind on this one. So once again I will have to agree with the guru Chris and retract my last post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I just looked around the league and the best backup in the league is Charlie Batch. I don&#8217;t know what it is about him I don&#8217;t like maybe just his name. But like I said in my other post. He hasn&#8217;t done anything wrong when he has played, and makes good decisions. But he is the best option besides Leftwitch,and we all know we couldn&#8217;t keep him on the sidelines. Well I am the one with my *&amp;$! in the wind on this one. So once again I will have to agree with the guru Chris and retract my last post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2009/08/03/steelers-training-camp-battlezone/comment-page-1/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=1063#comment-668</guid>
		<description>&quot;O&quot;:  I have to ask, did Charlie Batch mess up a point spread and cost you a bet or something?  Frankly, I&#039;m a bit shocked by your negative view of him.

Do you remember back in 2006 when Ben had his appendix/motorcycle fiascos?  Batch did a great job starting (and winning) the season opener.  Then Ben returned and played like crap for the first month, including a loss to the Raiders (who only won 2 freakin&#039; games that whole year!).  And during that month I remember listening to talk show callers blast Cowher for rushing Ben and begging for us to play Batch.

Now I&#039;m not saying Batch is as good as Ben.  But I think it&#039;s fair to say 100% of Batch is better than 60% of Ben.  And that&#039;s pretty much what you expect from a backup in the NFL. There aren&#039;t 32 spectacular STARTING QBs in the league.  So I don&#039;t really see how you can expect the backup to be spectacular, too.  There&#039;s nothing wrong with solid.

Most backups are either young players who have holes that need years of coaching to fix or vets who used to be starters but sucked.  The good teams usually go the sucky vet route (The Giants have David Carr.  The Cowgirls have Kitna.) as we did last year with Leftwich.  Batch also fits that mold and I&#039;d much rather have him than a young inexperienced player such as Cassel, who finished strong but was horrible the first 3-4 weeks which cost his team a playoff spot.  

Honestly, as long as Batch is healthy and can play at 2006-07 level, I&#039;m happy with him.  Who would you rather see backing up Ben?  Perhaps if you can give me a name or two of who you have in mind when you say &quot;plenty of QBs that would happily wait behind Big Ben&quot; I can see what your idea of a spectacular backup is.  Because right now I have no idea what better option(s) are out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;O&#8221;:  I have to ask, did Charlie Batch mess up a point spread and cost you a bet or something?  Frankly, I&#8217;m a bit shocked by your negative view of him.</p>
<p>Do you remember back in 2006 when Ben had his appendix/motorcycle fiascos?  Batch did a great job starting (and winning) the season opener.  Then Ben returned and played like crap for the first month, including a loss to the Raiders (who only won 2 freakin&#8217; games that whole year!).  And during that month I remember listening to talk show callers blast Cowher for rushing Ben and begging for us to play Batch.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not saying Batch is as good as Ben.  But I think it&#8217;s fair to say 100% of Batch is better than 60% of Ben.  And that&#8217;s pretty much what you expect from a backup in the NFL. There aren&#8217;t 32 spectacular STARTING QBs in the league.  So I don&#8217;t really see how you can expect the backup to be spectacular, too.  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with solid.</p>
<p>Most backups are either young players who have holes that need years of coaching to fix or vets who used to be starters but sucked.  The good teams usually go the sucky vet route (The Giants have David Carr.  The Cowgirls have Kitna.) as we did last year with Leftwich.  Batch also fits that mold and I&#8217;d much rather have him than a young inexperienced player such as Cassel, who finished strong but was horrible the first 3-4 weeks which cost his team a playoff spot.  </p>
<p>Honestly, as long as Batch is healthy and can play at 2006-07 level, I&#8217;m happy with him.  Who would you rather see backing up Ben?  Perhaps if you can give me a name or two of who you have in mind when you say &#8220;plenty of QBs that would happily wait behind Big Ben&#8221; I can see what your idea of a spectacular backup is.  Because right now I have no idea what better option(s) are out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "O"</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2009/08/03/steelers-training-camp-battlezone/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>"O"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=1063#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Am I the only person that wishes we would get rid of Charlie Batch? He has not done anything wrong when he has played but had not done anything spectacular either. I myself don&#039;t feel he is the best option we could come up with for a backup QB. We should shop around for a good number two other than Charlie Batch. There are plenty of QB&#039;s that would happily wait for a turn to play behind Big Ben. I always get a sick feeling in my stomach when Batch goes in to the game. What do you think Chris?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person that wishes we would get rid of Charlie Batch? He has not done anything wrong when he has played but had not done anything spectacular either. I myself don&#8217;t feel he is the best option we could come up with for a backup QB. We should shop around for a good number two other than Charlie Batch. There are plenty of QB&#8217;s that would happily wait for a turn to play behind Big Ben. I always get a sick feeling in my stomach when Batch goes in to the game. What do you think Chris?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 6/13 queries in 0.048 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 309/313 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: nicepickcowher.com @ 2013-05-18 18:11:52 by W3 Total Cache -->