<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pouncey²: Could the Pouncey brothers end up on the same line in 2011?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicepickcowher.com/2011/03/01/pouncey2-could-the-pouncey-brothers-end-up-on-the-same-line-in-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2011/03/01/pouncey2-could-the-pouncey-brothers-end-up-on-the-same-line-in-2011/</link>
	<description>A Pittsburgh Steelers Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taking a mock draft stance &#171; Nice Pick, Cowher &#124; A Pittsburgh Steelers Blog</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2011/03/01/pouncey2-could-the-pouncey-brothers-end-up-on-the-same-line-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3711</link>
		<dc:creator>Taking a mock draft stance &#171; Nice Pick, Cowher &#124; A Pittsburgh Steelers Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=6096#comment-3711</guid>
		<description>[...] pick, so I&#8217;m going to be bold in my stance on how the Steelers will draft this year.  In my very first post (aside from my introduction) I argued Mike Pouncey would be a very sensible and solid pick for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pick, so I&#8217;m going to be bold in my stance on how the Steelers will draft this year.  In my very first post (aside from my introduction) I argued Mike Pouncey would be a very sensible and solid pick for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thin</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2011/03/01/pouncey2-could-the-pouncey-brothers-end-up-on-the-same-line-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>Thin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=6096#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>The rub is that Randle El makes far too much dough to be a 5th WR/disaster QB(he threw the ball, what, once this year?)  Yet that is precisely what he is.  He was brought in to be the third WR/bridge to the younger guys.  Both younger guys have passed him on the depth chart.  He&#039;s served his purpose.  They needn&#039;t cut him, but they need him to take a pay cut to assist in keeping Taylor.  Wouldn&#039;t hold my breath on that, but you never know.

Bottom line, Ike Taylor&#039;s far more important to the team than Randle El is.  I think that was the point the original post was trying to make.

As to the OL....Pouncey2 playd C this year for the Gators, and didn&#039;t look anywhere near as good as he did in &#039;09 as a G(which is fine, since that&#039;s where he&#039;d be playing in the NFL anyway).  The problem I see with him is this:  There&#039;s the chance that he&#039;s going to already be thought of in the same mold as Maurkice and teams are more likely to reach for him early.  Flat out...you do NOT take a guard in the the top 20.  Not unless he&#039;s the next John Hannah.  Mike Pouncey is not John Hannah.  He&#039;s not even the next Maurkice.  Mike&#039;s a good, solid interior lineman.  He&#039;s not &quot;top 20&quot; good.

As mentioned, there are quite a few nice OL prospects, particularly on the interior, in this draft class.  Why reach for Pouncey in the middle of round one when you can wait til round two, potentially without trading up at all, and still have a shot at guys like Cannon, Wisnewski, Ijalana, etc.?  

If the Steelers want to burn the picks to move up 15 spots it better be to select a CB or an OT.  The quality of those two positions, particularly CB, falls off much quicker in this crop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rub is that Randle El makes far too much dough to be a 5th WR/disaster QB(he threw the ball, what, once this year?)  Yet that is precisely what he is.  He was brought in to be the third WR/bridge to the younger guys.  Both younger guys have passed him on the depth chart.  He&#8217;s served his purpose.  They needn&#8217;t cut him, but they need him to take a pay cut to assist in keeping Taylor.  Wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath on that, but you never know.</p>
<p>Bottom line, Ike Taylor&#8217;s far more important to the team than Randle El is.  I think that was the point the original post was trying to make.</p>
<p>As to the OL&#8230;.Pouncey2 playd C this year for the Gators, and didn&#8217;t look anywhere near as good as he did in &#8217;09 as a G(which is fine, since that&#8217;s where he&#8217;d be playing in the NFL anyway).  The problem I see with him is this:  There&#8217;s the chance that he&#8217;s going to already be thought of in the same mold as Maurkice and teams are more likely to reach for him early.  Flat out&#8230;you do NOT take a guard in the the top 20.  Not unless he&#8217;s the next John Hannah.  Mike Pouncey is not John Hannah.  He&#8217;s not even the next Maurkice.  Mike&#8217;s a good, solid interior lineman.  He&#8217;s not &#8220;top 20&#8243; good.</p>
<p>As mentioned, there are quite a few nice OL prospects, particularly on the interior, in this draft class.  Why reach for Pouncey in the middle of round one when you can wait til round two, potentially without trading up at all, and still have a shot at guys like Cannon, Wisnewski, Ijalana, etc.?  </p>
<p>If the Steelers want to burn the picks to move up 15 spots it better be to select a CB or an OT.  The quality of those two positions, particularly CB, falls off much quicker in this crop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megslin</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2011/03/01/pouncey2-could-the-pouncey-brothers-end-up-on-the-same-line-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator>Megslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=6096#comment-3685</guid>
		<description>I definitely hear what you&#039;re saying. I think that after ARE (and Foote and even McFadden) made a big deal about how they were happy to come back to the Steelers and how the grass isn&#039;t greener on other teams, he probably would take some kind of pay cut if he wants to keep playing. So there&#039;s hope there. 

And while I agree he probably was covered less than some of the other guys, I do stand by my last point, that he&#039;s a proven receiver, whereas the young guys (Who I do LOVE), aren&#039;t quite yet. They&#039;ve shown remarkable talent, are definite starter quality,and have made some amazing plays, but sometimes a veteran just knows how to shut it down in a way a 1st or 2nd year guy may not think of/be nervous to. I just want all of our bases covered so we can (lockout pending) head back to the Superbowl in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely hear what you&#8217;re saying. I think that after ARE (and Foote and even McFadden) made a big deal about how they were happy to come back to the Steelers and how the grass isn&#8217;t greener on other teams, he probably would take some kind of pay cut if he wants to keep playing. So there&#8217;s hope there. </p>
<p>And while I agree he probably was covered less than some of the other guys, I do stand by my last point, that he&#8217;s a proven receiver, whereas the young guys (Who I do LOVE), aren&#8217;t quite yet. They&#8217;ve shown remarkable talent, are definite starter quality,and have made some amazing plays, but sometimes a veteran just knows how to shut it down in a way a 1st or 2nd year guy may not think of/be nervous to. I just want all of our bases covered so we can (lockout pending) head back to the Superbowl in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2011/03/01/pouncey2-could-the-pouncey-brothers-end-up-on-the-same-line-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3684</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=6096#comment-3684</guid>
		<description>Megslin,

I don&#039;t disagree with you assessment of ARE.  He is indeed one of the most diverse receivers out there - fast, decent hands, and he can throw the ball.  But you have to consider what makes the Steelers really good and really good for all these years - player development.  Since Colbert has stepped onto the scene, the organization has done a really great job taking rookies and making them into starters anywhere from year 1 to 3.  In my opinion that doesn&#039;t happen very often with teams in the NFL... at least consistently.  ARE is the second highest paid receiver next to Ward and the second oldest of the core next to Ward.  1.7 mil is nothing to shake at and if it is the difference of keeping your best corner (when you have a secondary already not that great), I think the choice is pretty obvious.  
ARE put up good stats in the Super Bowl, but I would argue it was only because the GB corners were doing a fine job of shutting down the outsides.  Next season put a younger slot receiver in the same situation, and I&#039;m sure he would have done just as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megslin,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree with you assessment of ARE.  He is indeed one of the most diverse receivers out there &#8211; fast, decent hands, and he can throw the ball.  But you have to consider what makes the Steelers really good and really good for all these years &#8211; player development.  Since Colbert has stepped onto the scene, the organization has done a really great job taking rookies and making them into starters anywhere from year 1 to 3.  In my opinion that doesn&#8217;t happen very often with teams in the NFL&#8230; at least consistently.  ARE is the second highest paid receiver next to Ward and the second oldest of the core next to Ward.  1.7 mil is nothing to shake at and if it is the difference of keeping your best corner (when you have a secondary already not that great), I think the choice is pretty obvious.<br />
ARE put up good stats in the Super Bowl, but I would argue it was only because the GB corners were doing a fine job of shutting down the outsides.  Next season put a younger slot receiver in the same situation, and I&#8217;m sure he would have done just as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://nicepickcowher.com/2011/03/01/pouncey2-could-the-pouncey-brothers-end-up-on-the-same-line-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-3683</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicepickcowher.com/?p=6096#comment-3683</guid>
		<description>The problem I see is that with the CAP to be considered aging veterans always seem to want more than they are worth.  The rare exception I remember in Black and Gold history was Bettis taking a huge pay cut to stay.  While ARE doesn&#039;t make huge money he still can&#039;t command what he once did just to be a saftey net/trick play guy.  If he was willing be be reasonable then I say keep him but not even at the money he makes now much less the more he will probably want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I see is that with the CAP to be considered aging veterans always seem to want more than they are worth.  The rare exception I remember in Black and Gold history was Bettis taking a huge pay cut to stay.  While ARE doesn&#8217;t make huge money he still can&#8217;t command what he once did just to be a saftey net/trick play guy.  If he was willing be be reasonable then I say keep him but not even at the money he makes now much less the more he will probably want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 17/26 queries in 0.084 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 349/365 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: nicepickcowher.com @ 2013-05-22 04:33:43 by W3 Total Cache -->