Comments on: The Steelers, Under-the-Radar Yet Still Important Positional Needs, and The Draft

By: hart6399

hart6399 — Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:42:21 +0000

@craig.nicepickcowher @DomDiTolla
And the hamstring injury was minor, but any minor injury lingers IF time isn’t allowed for it to heal. Continuing to play with it will make it look more severe.I would doubt it would be a problem that would carry over the entire offseason and make him less of a player considering he is a very young player. The point of focusing on his hamstring injury..still ridiculous. The point was the depth……not the health and deterioration of Woodley. But it’s okay……..you are welcome to your opinion.

By: hart6399

hart6399 — Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:34:44 +0000

@craig.nicepickcowher @DomDiTolla
And I have a chip, but to question anything you ‘writers’ say is just silly. I would say the chip rests squarely on your shoulder.

By: hart6399

hart6399 — Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:33:45 +0000

@craig.nicepickcowher @DomDiTolla
So I keep responding? You are mighty touchy. Are you two dating or something?

By: craig.nicepickcowher

craig.nicepickcowher — Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:42:45 +0000

@hart6399 @DomDiTolla What makes focusing on Woodley ridiculous? He was a shell of himself when he returned from his hammy. In fact most players are when they get hamstring injuries. Minor? I think not considering his first few games back he sat out a bunch of series because it kept bothering him – so yeah he lost something of himself and will need to prove he hasn’t lost it altogether when he comes back to camp. Though an ACL tear is more ‘serious’ because it requires surgery, a hamstring can be almost as serious because of how it can keep coming back to haunt a player the rest of the season – see Johnson for the Texans last season too.
So if you understand, why do you keep coming back to argue the point?
Dom’s not condescending. He truly thanks all of his readers for their comments no matter how argumentative they are. We all appreciate our readers and their opinions. How about just ditching the chip on your shoulder?

By: hart6399

hart6399 — Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:40:41 +0000

@DomDiTolla
The point of the article is understood. The whole paragraph that focuses on Lamarr Woodley is ridiculous. Simply put….they need depth in case of injury without having to focus on how Woodley was injured and “was a shell of himself”. Makes it sound like he has lost something when that would be a ridiculous statement at this point after a minor hamstring injury…..not a torn ACL or something like that. A hamstring injury to a passrusher would obviously cause that. All teams have to acquire depth and still have limited roster spaces to consider also. I think I can figure that out. Nice condescending leave with “hey, you’re entitled to your opinion” as if you are a draft expert and GM. Thanks for allowing folks to have an opinion. Much appreciated.