How many games will #17 ultimately miss? It is a decision which is up to him. Mandatory Credit: Charles LeClaire-USPRESSWIRE

Steelers Possess Ultimate Trump Card Over #17, But Should They Use It?


Just because the Pittsburgh Steelers’ Front Office does not fold like origami and cower in fear of its players cannot truly classify them as “harsh” or anything of the sort.  To me and many others, Pittsburgh’s Front Office has employed a stern and sensible approach with their diva-esque pass catcher, and it is Colbert & Co., not #17, which hold the ultimate “Trump Card” in this stand-off.  In fact, when one takes a look at the entire scenario, it is Colbert & Co. which could make life exponentially worse for “The No Show Speedster,” and can do so with one simple action because #17 has to sign his tender at some point.  The only question now will be: “Will the Steelers’ Front Office resort to playing it if #17 is gone for a lengthy spell away from the club?”

 

Bench #17 Indefinitely Once He Signs Tender

This move would be the ultimate “pie in the face” “kick to the groin” gesture and I would love nothing more than to see Coach Tomlin administer this awesome form of justice if #17 continues to try to “leverage” his way into whatever it is he wants.  Nevertheless, this move should only be employed under the following circumstances:

 

1. #17 sits out for at least the first half of the season (8+ games)

2. The Steelers’ Offense can make due without him

3. Steelers are entirely out of Postseason chase

4. Fine Having $2.7 Million & Change as a 2012 Sunk Cost

 

Granted, all of these have yet to happen, only one Preseason game is in the books, and replacing a 2-time Pro Bowler is a pretty tall order.  Yet what better way to show “His Greediness” that there are consequences for his actions, and illustrate to him that his behavior has repercussions like riding “The Pine Pony” for the duration of the 2012 campaign.

Moreover, what could #17 do about his benching if it occurred?  Seriously, what could he do?  With all of the veterans still in the locker-room, and an entire team focused on a postseason push, there is no way #17 could disrupt anything by whining like a 10 year-old without getting slapped upside the head by a guy like Deebo.  Or if the circumstances arise where the team is not in any sort of postseason race, why allow him to pad his stats over a short season just to enter Free Agency?  He should not be the one benefiting from his actions which were taken at the organization’s expense during a down campaign.

If the Steelers took this specific course of action with #17, he would be out of football for an entire season before he hit the UFA market this upcoming offseason after he signed the tender.  Sure, the Steelers could always give #17 the Franchise Tag in 2013, but if the relationship gets this frosty and actions like the one I just mentioned take place, there is no way Pittsburgh will want his sorry behind to return.  Let #17 test the Unrestricted Free Agent market next year after he has not played in a meaningful game since January of 2012.  Let #17 see what other teams are willing to offer to a Wide Receiver after a year has been erased in the prime of his career.  No franchise was willing to spend a 1st Round pick on him as an RFA this past season, so I am almost positive (barring the stupidity of Washington and Dallas) no franchise will sign him for even Antonio Brown money come March of 2013.

Would a move such as this one be rather under-handed and low for such a classy franchise like the Steelers?  Sure, just a bit.  But you know what else is cold-hearted?  Turning down a contract extension, sitting out and not signing an RFA tender, not contacting the G.M., all of which while a new Offensive system is being installed.  Ultimately, a message like this one mentioned above would reverberate all over the N.F.L., because it would show each and every player that the Steelers’ Front Office is not to be trifled with and must be treated with respect in each and all instances.  They will not cower to anybody and make offers which they feel are at market value for a player’s skill-set and potential.

 

Final Thoughts

If you have not already gathered, I find #17’s recent actions regarding his contract somewhat childish and in a way downright ridiculous.  Considering the circumstances of how the Steelers’ Front Office reached out to him about a contract extension (apparently worth $50 million), did not lower his RFA tender when they could have, and did so when the team was (and is) in “Salary Cap Hell on Earth,” it just makes my stomach turn.

And for those of you saying “Pay the Man” or he “is doing what anybody would do,” let me get this off my chest.  First, to simply sign a tender worth $2.7 million while a long-term deal is worked out is not that difficult a task, especially when one has almost zero leverage whatsoever in the matter and is ignorant enough to believe that it is true. Second and most importantly, there are countless people in this country out of work or who have been out of work for extended periods during this recession, and numerous others which have to work day-labor and labor-intensive jobs which would never see the type of coin on the RFA tender in their entire lives.

In fact, almost all, if not all of them probably will never see that amount of money combined for their work in their lifetime. (let alone the apparent contract which was offered to him).  And when a person like #17 apparently turns down offers of that caliber, he is not likely to win the hearts and minds of fans of his team.  I am sure he could care less about what the fans think, but if he makes his debut in Weeks 8-10, he might get sick of the cascades of “Boos” which raining down upon him from his home crowd. Hey, I am all for marketing oneself for higher wages/salaries, it would be un-American to not do so if one has the leverage to make it happen.  But that is the ultimate kicker: #17 is facing off against the Steelers’ Front Office, a battle he simply cannot win, and others like Ike Taylor and Jerome Bettis find is a fight foolish to pick in the first place.

While I do not believe the Steelers will go to such extremes as the one I mentioned above to punish a player for an action such as not signing an RFA tender, I do hope Pittsburgh puts the proverbial “heat” on #17 if he continues his behavior into the regular season.  Whether they sign a veteran like Plaxico Burress, get Heath Miller or some of the Rookies like Toney Clemons or Marquis Maze more reps and chances to catch the ball, or even bench #17 outright, this franchise needs to (and will) show that #17′s consequences have actions.  The only questions now are: “How much longer will #17 remain absent?”  and “Will the Steelers make him pay dearly for his actions if they choose to do it?”.

 

 

What say you readers:  Are you sick of #17′s actions?  What should the organization do about him?  Should they resort to benching him if he is gone for an extended period?  Is $2.7 million dollars too high a price tag for revenge?  Share your thoughts, comments, questions, and concerns.

 

 

 

For all your Steelers news and discussions follow us on Twitter @nicepickcowherC, follow me on Twitter @DominicDiTolla, and like us on Facebook.

Tags: 2012 Season Antonio Brown Chris Rainey Emmanuel Sanders Featured Heath Miller Jerricho Cotchery Mike Wallace Pittsburgh Steelers Plaxico Burress Popular Toney Clemons

  • Lee

    If he didn’t show til week ten he wouldn’t get all 2.7 would he? He would just get a prorated amount for the weeks he was active.

  • http://www.whitesvariety.com Aaron

    This is silly at best. Yes, Mike wants a big, long-term contract (and who can blame him!), however, he needs to avoid injury at all costs until he gets it. The Steelers realize this, as does Mike’s agent. I don’t agree with what he’s doing, but, if you put yourself in his situation I’m sure you can understand his angle a little bit.

    If Mike goes to training camp and incurs a major injury during full contact workouts, which places him inactive, it’s going to cost him significant money. We’re talking about tens of MILLIONS of dollars. Yes, after signing his tender he’d still get paid for this season. But, The Steelers aren’t going to offer you the same type of contract if you’re not healthy in two weeks as opposed to if you are healthy (if anything at all is offered). No one else is going to make you a fair market value offer if you’re injured either.

    For Mike, injury would be a multi-year setback. Not only do you have to rehab for a year, you also, most likely, have to play another season without the security of a long-term deal. During that season, you have to do really well, again, to be back where you were right now.

    Also note, Mike isn’t saying anything right now and I don’t think there will be issues once he reports to camp.

  • Kimmy

    I don’t see the Steelers operating like that with any grudges against Wallace once he reports. This is all business for them once he shows he will be welcomed with open arms by the front office, coaching staff and players.

  • Michael

    Even IF your asinine scenario did play out, and he was benched, etc….this is STILL the NFL (Numerous Fools League) and someone would still sign him to a mega-bucks deal. Seriously, teams are still willing to pay one of the All-Time Great Cancers of the NFL, Terrel Owens, to a contract. Wallace will play somehwere in 2013, put up big numbers, & make big coin.

  • WoodlandsTXStlrFan

    Silly is not the word. Your argument and the constant arguments so called pundits and experts throw out there about “how dare he with the poor out of work” or the “oh so many people are underpaid, work labor intensive…” is flat out garbage. And before you stand on your soapbox again…I have been out of work for about 4 months. You simply cannot compare Mike Wallace or any other professional athlete to the general public. In fact you can’t even compare one segment of America to another…white collar vs. blue collar, educated vs. uneducated, industry to industry.

    I agree that Mike Wallace has no leverage. He should get into camp and work out a fair deal for both sides. The fact that the Steelers are in “Salary Cap Hell on Earth” should not be a factor in Mike Wallace’s negotiations. Mike Wallace should negotiate what his market rate is. His agent, Bus Cook – by all accounts a very good agent, should know his market rate. And it’s not stupid money like Larry Fitzgerald or Calvin Johnson. I think it would be more like Miles Austin’s contract with a little more per year, maybe $1M, and a little more guaranteed, maybe $25M. 6 years, $62.5 with $25M guaranteed (that’s two year’s salary), signing bonus $10M. This contract would be appropriate for both sides. Nobody takes the top off like Mike Wallace, he is dependable, still growing in route running, etc., decent guy, smart enough to learn offenses (did well with BA’s offense), and will be around for Ben’s prime.

    IMO – Bus Cook needs to state Wallace’s market rate (along with reasons) and the Steelers need to do the same. Come together and get it done.

  • rob

    screw em’ – this isn’t a second class team to be pushed around by a player who has only just begun to show his skills, more importantly the team dosn’t need the the added distraction in the locker room. add in the dreaded “salery cap issues” and it’ a no brainer . let him join the ranks of ” B. O.” Owens and Oacho Stinko- chad johnson. how many SB rings do they have

  • Irish Steeler Fan

    Bring Plax back and leave Wallace on the bench for the year. No one player is bigger than the team!! He has one good season and expects to be among the highest paid players in the NFL?? His actions are a slap in the face to the blue collared fans of the Steelers and i personally hope that if he does make an appearance at Heinz field he gets booed right out of the ground. Players like him are toxic to the sport. He is just an arrogant, greedy S.O.B