Levi Brown Trade Is At Least Cost-Effective For Steelers

Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

 

Levi Brown was not living up to our expectations on the field, … At the end of the day, when you realize he is not in the long-term plans, instead of belaboring the point, it’s in the best interests of the organization to move on.

-Steve Keim, G.M. of the Arizona Cardinals (via the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review)

 

I threw up a bit in my mouth after I read the statement by Arizona’s general manager regarding Levi Brown. Then I remembered how badly LaMarr Woodley abused Brown in Super Bowl XLIII.  Of course, that was not a one-game anomaly for the player Arizona’s brass picked ahead of Adrian Peterson in the first round of the 2007 NFL Draft.

Brown has been one of the least effective left tackles since he transitioned over to the position in 2010, and his play inspired the Cardinals’ brass to be more than willing to dump him on another team.

As much as I have illustrated my disdain regarding the recent trade, it is actually a decent move for the Steelers from a financial perspective now that more details of the contract have come to light.

I do give credit to Pittsburgh’s front office for essentially obtaining Brown for the one-year rental price of $715,000, the veteran minimum salary according to Mark Kaboly of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.  Although losing any draft pick stings a rebuilding franchise, I can understand the desperation exhibited by Pittsburgh’s front office to pull the trigger on a financially sound move.

Reservations aside regarding the fact that the Cardinals are paying close to $4 million to see Brown walk, the acquisition represented a low-risk financial endeavor for Pittsburgh’s front office to undertake.

If the veteran flops, then the Steelers’ brass can release him relatively easily since there is no guaranteed money attached to him according to Kaboly. Yet if he can somehow illustrate any signs of competency, the front office might be able to keep him around as a quality veteran if he is willing to restructure.

While I believe that the move to acquire Brown was unnecessary, especially with giving up a much-needed draft pick, the veteran still has the potential to provide enough cost-effective offensive line insurance for the cap-strapped Steelers to hopefully limp through the rest of this horrendous 2013 regular season.

Plus, if the presence of Brown and the emergence of Kelvin Beachum cannot light a fire under the recently demoted Mike Adams, then maybe “Mr. Stay Puft” shouldn’t be a part of this team’s rebuilding plans.

 

 

 

Stats & Info. Provided By: ESPN.comSteelers.com and Pro Football Reference

 

Follow me on Twitter: @DominicDiTolla

Follow & Like “NPC” on Facebook: Nice Pick, Cowher

Topics: Levi Brown, Pittsburgh Steelers

Want more from Nice Pick, Cowher?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • bk

    Need to try to get more draft picks, not give them away..WT heck (not my first choice) is this team management thinking? Already down a third rd pick now losing another?
    All for what? This guy is not any better than what is already on the roster.. Do these guys think he is going to turn into Joe Thomas or something? Crazy Stupid…

    • Dom DiTolla

      Exactly, the only positive thing about this deal is that it’s cheap and the Steelers can get rid of him after the season. Throwing away draft picks is never an answer, but with the way they’ve drafted recently the front office and Tomlin seem to be doing a good job of that anyway. Lol.

  • SamyyCiao

    Stuip Move